UniTopic

The Sony PlayStation and Microsoft’s Xbox made moves on Nintendo’s Wii at the Electronic Entertainment Expo — the three days each year when all eyes are on the video-gaming world.

With new systems that let players control games with their own movements, the industry’s “big three” now find themselves locked in a battle for dominance in what was once a single-player arena.

Video games, of course, are a world ruled by high scores — preferably ones that come after destroying your opponent with a dramatic finishing move.

So, did anyone strike a killing blow at E3?

Most analysts are saying it’s too early to tell.

“I’m excited by the hardware; the hardware all looks great,” said Shaun McInnis, associate editor at Gamespot.com. “It’s going to be interesting.”

McInnis and others are saying that it will be the software that ultimately will tell the tale.

Microsoft’s Kinect, a motion-sensing system that requires no game controller at all, and Sony’s Move, with a Wii-like wand that charts body movement, both showed off capabilities that largely lived up to their billing.

But the games that the companies are offering on the new systems are, perhaps understandably, limited at this point.

On Kinect, Microsoft showed off some compelling-looking titles, but ones that will mostly remind gamers of the first-generation party games that were offered for the Wii.

Sony offers a couple of its established titles, the new “LittleBigPlanet 2″ and “SOCOM 4″ games, for Move. But aside from “Sorcery,” a nice-looking adventure game, the titles fall into the familiar dancing, fighting and kids games categories.

Meanwhile, Nintendo — which made its biggest single splash by rolling out its Nintendo 3DS handheld device — countered with a flurry of titles for the Wii that harken back to the company’s storied place in gaming history.

New “The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword,” “Donkey Kong Country Returns” and “Mario Sports Mix” games were announced. So were “GoldenEye,” an update of the classic James Bond-inspired shooter, and “NBA Jam,” another old favorite getting a new twist.

“Sony and Microsoft don’t really have that” on motion-controlled games, McInnis said. “There’s no big, familiar games.”

Dan Hsu, co-founder of gaming-news site Bitmob, agreed that no clear winner emerged from the week, but said that Microsoft’s Kinect, known previously by its code name, Project Natal, might have suffered a bit from pre-show hype.

“I wouldn’t say any of them lost, because I don’t think anybody walked away from any of the press conferences thinking that company didn’t do a good job,” Hsu said. “But I’d say the one making the smallest splash might have been Microsoft.

“Most of the titles they showed, we’ve heard of before. There weren’t a lot of surprises there.”

Hsu said Nintendo made the biggest impact with a single device at E3 with its 3DS.

“Once you actually got to see it, you realize that this was some new technology that we’ve not seen before,” he said. “It’s visually stunning.”

While not personally fired up about the games offered on the new motion systems, Hsu said he is excited about their long-term potential. Kinect, for example, showcases voice recognition on “Kinectimals,” a kid-friendly game that drew “oohs” and “ahs” from folks inclined toward such things.

But it might take a couple of years to see if either of the new players can cut seriously into Nintendo’s hold on motion gaming.

Here’s our take on other “winners” and “losers” from E3:

Winner: The cloud-gaming platform Steam was a big winner with the announcement of “Portal 2″ for the console. “Portal 2″ will be the sequel to the surprise 2007 PC hit, “Portal,” that was included in “The Orange Box” game bundle.

Steam also announced that it will be bringing its cloud gaming network to the PlayStation 3, offering automatic updates and online saving of games in progress — a big win for players.

Winner: Numbers fared well at E3 — as in the kind that appear in game titles. Many of the gaming world’s major franchises will be coming out with fresh content to keep their fans happy.

“SOCOM 4,” “Gran Turismo 5,” “LittleBigPlanet 2,” “Gears of War 3″ and “Dead Space 2″ are just some of the follow-up titles that will be hitting consoles and PCs later this year.

Loser: Gamers’ pocketbooks are going to take a hit with new hardware upgrades. The 3-D advancements are going to cost a pretty penny for a new television/monitor and specialized glasses.

Sony is bundling its Move controller with the navigation controller, PlayStation Eye and a Move-ready game for just under $100. Microsoft hasn’t released a price for its Kinect motion-controller, but online rumors suggest the Xbox add-on may cost about $150 to $400.

Nintendo also has been silent on its new 3-D handheld console, 3DS. But the current price of the Nintendo DSi XL is slightly under $200, so the 3DS likely will top that number.

Loser: Santa is in for a rough season unless he starts working out now.

Last year, many blockbuster titles waited until after the holidays to come out due to the overwhelming demand for “Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2,” a first-person shooter game that sold 4.7 million copies worldwide in the first 24 hours of release. This year, many “must-have” titles will be stuffing Santa’s bag and breaking his back.

“Civilization V” (September), “Medal of Honor” (October), “Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit” (November) and many others are expected to be on wish lists for the holidays — along with the new gaming systems from the big three.

When AT&T announced this week that it would end its unlimited, all-you-can-download data plan for the iPhone and iPad, the refrain from the tech world went something like this:

“OMG! More monthly charges!?!?!”

The Wall Street Journal says the change may drive some customers away from the iPhone and to smartphones on other networks. Writing for Computer World, Matt Hamblen says AT&T “could be compared to a warlord arriving in a savage land and laying down basic rules for sharing a limited, vital resource — something as basic as water or available hunting grounds.”

It’s true that people who spend tons of time uploading and downloading photos and videos from their mobile devices may have to pay more under the change.

But, according to a survey from Consumer Reports, the majority of iPhone users will either pay the same amount or actually save money under this new AT&T data regime.

Right now, AT&T charges subscribers $30 per month for unlimited data — meaning the person who uploads 100 videos to YouTube per month pays the same as the person who only checks e-mail every now and then. Starting on Monday, however, new AT&T customers have to choose between two new data plans, neither of which has the “unlimited” data option.

The lighter-weight of the new plans gives mobile users 200 megabytes of data per month for $15. The “DataPro” plan gives people 2 gigabytes of data — about 10 times more — for $25 per month. Under both plans, AT&T charges customers extra if they go over their limits. See the full plan descriptions for more details.

Consumer Reports says most AT&T smartphone customers don’t use that much data — so, in theory, they would save money on this change.

The nonprofit group’s electronics blog explains:

“The average iPhone user consumes 273 MB of data per month, according to the unique data on iPhone usage reported a few months ago by colleague Jeff Blyskal. More than half of owners use less than 200 MB per month, that data reveals,” the blog post says. “The new $15 iPhone plan provides 200 MB per month, and so would cut data costs in half for the majority of iPhone owners.”

In an interview with CNN, Mike Gikas, Consumer Reports’ senior editor for electronics and technology, said these benefits may not last forever.

The trend is for people to use more and more data. As phones add higher-resolution cameras and as video on the mobile web becomes higher quality, data may get expensive under these caps, he said.

“With every generation of smartphones, the data usage goes up,” he said.

Apple is expected to announce a new version of the iPhone on Monday, and it’s been rumored the new iPhone will have a higher-resolution camera.

One key to this new data system is understanding how much data you use. AT&T has posted a data calculator to help consumers with this. Or to see how much data you actually use on your iPhone, go into “Settings,” click on “General,” and then select “Usage” from the menu. At the bottom of the page, you’ll see how much data you have sent and received since you last reset the stats.

You could reset everything and wait a month to see what your monthly data usage might look like. AT&T says 98 percent of its smartphone customers use less than 2GB of data per month, on average.

For months, the tech press has been drooling over details of a next-generation Apple iPhone, which likely will be unveiled on Monday at an event in California.

The phone is expected to be fitted with a higher-resolution screen, a front-facing camera that can be used for video conferencing and a camera flash.

But even with those new features, the iPhone is far from the undisputed crown jewel of the smartphone market, industry experts said in interviews on Thursday.

“They’ve lost their lead, and I don’t think this is going to vault them ahead of the pack again,” said Kevin Tofel, a blogger in the GigaOm network.

A growing number of competitors are giving the touch-screen, app-driven phone a run for its money. And they’re doing so not only with iPhone-like technical features, but with increasingly robust app stores and a variety of mobile phone contracts.

All of this makes choosing the right consumer-oriented smartphone incredibly confusing.

Before you jump to buy the new iPhone, check out the market to see what works best for you. Here are a few tips for your search:

Look at the carrier

Tofel, who covers mobile technology, said it’s smartest for consumers first to look at wireless network carriers — such as AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile in the U.S. — and then choose a phone from within the network.

“Don’t become totally enamored by the phone,” he said. “Make sure you pick your carrier first. If you buy a phone that drops calls all the time … or you’re going with a phone that really doesn’t have great coverage where you live and work, basically you’ve just bought an expensive brick.

“The phone isn’t really anything without the connections.”

Apple’s iPhone is available, for now, only through AT&T, which has the worst customer ratings in many major cities, according to Consumer Reports.

That’s a big advantage for phones that run on Google’s Android operating system, such as the Nexus One, Motorola Droid and HTC Droid Incredible, said Ramon Llamas, a senior research analyst at the firm IDC, since those phones work on other networks.

“A lot of people really like the [iPhone] device, they just don’t want to go to AT&T. So one of the advantages of looking at the Android platform is — guess what? — it’s at Sprint, it’s at T-Mobile and it’s at Verizon wireless,” he said.

Experts said potential phone buyers should ask friends and neighbors about how their cellular coverage fares near their homes and offices.

Hurry up and wait

Last year, when Apple introduced the iPhone 3GS, the price of the previous iPhone model, the 3G, dropped from $199 to $99.

Combine that with the fact that smartphone prices, in general, are coming down over time, and there’s quite a bit of financial incentive for consumers to wait before purchasing a new phone, said Ross Rubin, executive director of industry analysis at the NPD Group, a research firm.

“Prices for the devices themselves continue to come down on average and given the AT&T announcement yesterday [that it will end unlimited data plans], we’re starting to see a little progress on making the data plans for smartphones and high-end feature phones more affordable, which should also help spur growth,” he said.

Geek out on the OS

You may not use the term “OS” in daily life, but it’s important to know about mobile “operating systems” if you’re in the market for a smartphone.

The two main competitors these days — at least in terms of the touch-screen, consumer-oriented smartphones — are from Apple and Google, which puts out an operating system called Android.

In the same way that Windows manages the way you interact with information on a personal computer, mobile operating systems control the look and feel of a phone.

“It comes down to the experience. If you take away the experience, you just have a multihundred-dollar device filled with plastic, glass and metal,” Llamas said.

Apple is known for its sleek, simple-to-use OS.

“iPhone … has really set the standard for what a smartphone experience is for consumers,” Llamas said. “One of the great things about Apple is that part of its DNA is to make the entire process incredibly simple. Forget the manual; you take it out of the box, and you’ll figure it out in no time.”

Android leads the pack in some ways, however. Apple has said it will allow its phones to run more than one application at once starting this summer. The Android platform has allowed that functionality for some time.

“The software is really the differentiator,” said Tofel.

Is there an app for that?

If you’ve figured out the OS, the next things to think about are apps. Each mobile operating system has its own app store, where you can purchase apps — or “applications” — that will run on the phone.

Think games, social networks, maps and other fun tools.

Apple still has the biggest app store, with more than 200,000 apps. Google’s Android Market is known for being more open than Apple — meaning it doesn’t have to approve apps before they go on sale — but it only has about 50,000 on sale now, according to CNNMoney.

Michael Gikas, senior editor for electronics and technology at Consumer Reports, said Apple’s App Store provides consumers with a bigger reason to get the iPhone than the hardware of the phone itself.

“There’s no better source for all the things people love about smartphones than Apple’s iTunes and App Store,” he said. “They’re the giant.”

‘Screen’ the competition

Screens are becoming a bigger deal to consumers who are looking for new smartphones, the experts said. The standing logic is this: When you use your phone to watch YouTube videos and movies, bigger is better.

“People want a lot of screen real-estate,” Llamas said.

So far, Apple has not been the leader in screen technology, according to experts, although there are rumors that Apple may update the iPhone’s screen on Monday. The iPhone screen currently is 3.5 inches, measured diagonally, and that’s not as big as some of its current and upcoming Android competitors.

The HTC Evo, for example, which comes out on Friday, has a 4.3-inch screen.

Gikas said several Android phones are technically superior to the iPhone, but cautioned that consumers should consider the whole smartphone system.

“The Android phones are really kicking butt,” he said. “The phones are really good. They’re very close or may even surpass this generation of iPhone in terms of performance. They have large screens. They have fast processors.”

Rubin of the NPD group said future smartphones screens will continue to get bigger — as big as possible so that they’ll still fit in a pant pocket — and may add 3-D capability in coming years.

Saying it will “change the future of television,” Google on Thursday rolled out Google TV — the internet giant’s venture into web-TV integration.

The application, run by Google’s Android operating system, lets users search for content from their television, DVR and the web.

“Here we are folks — the multimillion-channel TV,” said Google project director Rishi Chandra during a two-hour keynote on Google’s Android operating system at the company’s annual I/O conference in San Francisco, California.

Even as sites like Google-owned YouTube have emerged as viable entertainment options, the move is a nod to a basic truth of leisure time: The estimated 4 billion television users worldwide is still a much bigger customer base than those using the internet.

“There’s still not a better medium to reach a wider and broader audience than television,” Chandra said.

The platform will let users search for content, from the name of a TV show to the name of a network, in much the same way a Google search works. They’ll get results from TV and the web and be able to watch either on their TV screen.

It also will have voice recognition, letting users speak the name of a show or other content and have it pop up on their screens.

“Videos should be consumed on the biggest, best, brightest screen in your house,” Chandra said. “That’s your TV.”

Devices for Google TV will be sold at Best Buy and on the market this fall, in time for the lucrative holiday shopping season. No prices were announced on Thursday.

The system will allow Android smartphone applications to be displayed on television screens and such integration as being able to watch a show on TV and a Twitter stream of people talking about that show at the same time.

A Google TV home screen will let users organize their content, like shows they’ve recorded on their DVR, and integration will let users view photos from such sites as Flickr and Picasa on their TV screens.

In addition to Best Buy, other partners include Sony, which will launch a line of TVs that optimize the Google service, Intel, Logitech and DISH Network — which also will offer features specifically for Google TV.

Developing for the system will be open, a fact that let Google’s top brass take several shots at Apple’s iPad and iPhone. They pointedly noted that Adobe’s Flash media player will be integrated into the system’s Web browser.

Adobe and Apple have been feuding publicly, and loudly, over Apple’s refusal to run Flash on its products.

“We’re thrilled to be part of the Google TV initiative with other industry leaders who share a common vision of enabling access to the best web experiences possible,” said Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen, who attended the event.

Googleisn’t the first company to meld web and TV content.

In March, TiVo rolled out TiVo Premiere, which lets subscribers pull internet content, music and movies onto their televisions more easily.

The Boxee Box, a cubelike device that shares internet content with your TV, was awarded the title of “Last Gadget Standing” at January’s Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

And California-based company Roku also offers a digital video player that integrates television, Web content and a video library. It retails for about $100.

Sales of the iPad are already outpacing those of the Mac in the United States, according to an analyst’s calculations.

Apple is selling more than 200,000 iPads per week, says Mike Abramsky, an RBC Capital Markets analyst. That’s almost twice the rate of Mac computers, which average about 110,000 units sold each week.

The iPad isn’t outselling the iPhone, though it’s coming close. Apple was selling about 246,000 units of the iPhone 3GS per week during its first quarter of launch.

“Checks indicate that U.S. iPad sales remain strong post-launch, driven by rising consumer visibility to iPad’s user experience, sustained PR/word-of-mouth marketing, 3G iPad launch, and broadening iPad apps/content,” Abramsky said in a note to clients.

Apple announced in early May that it sold one million iPads after only one month. In light of his calculations, Abramsky estimates the company will sell 8 millioniPads in 2010, up from his previous projection of 5 million.

The iPad has only been selling for a month and a half, and it’s difficult to tell whether the 200,000 figure will hold steady in the coming months. However, it’s still significant that early signs suggest the iPad is growing quickly.

After all, the Mac category consists of several models of multiple computers, including the Mac Mini, iMac and MacBook Pro. So it’s surprising to see that early sales of the iPad, which comes in six different configurations, have already outpaced the sales of all those Mac models combined.

What’s more, Apple has not marketed the iPad as a computer replacement, but rather a new device category sitting in between a smartphone and a computer. It’s possible the iPad is tapping into the enormous audience that was interested in netbooks, which sit in the same “in-between” category.

Add to that the media-hungry customers choosing the more versatile iPad over the iPod, along with the grandmas who have never owned a computer before buying an iPad, and it becomes clear why the tablet is selling so quickly.

Apple pressed local police to investigate the loss of a next-generation iPhone a day after Gizmodo published photographs, telling investigators that the prototype was so valuable, a price could not be placed on it, according to court documents made public Friday.

In response to arguments made by CNET and other media organizations, a San Mateo judge unsealed documents that provide a detailed glimpse into an April 20 meeting between Apple lawyers and executives, and law enforcement.

They also highlight a madcap dash for evidence that evening that led a police detective to a gas station, a church, and a bush in Redwood City where a thumb drive and a 1GB Lexar Media compact flash card were allegedly hidden.

During the meeting with law enforcement, Apple attorney George Riley told detectives that the publication of evidence of the device by Gizmodo–part of Gawker Media–was immensely damaging.

“People that would have otherwise purchased a currently existing Apple product would wait for the next item to be released, thereby hurting overall sales and negatively effecting Apple’s earnings,” Riley said, according to an affidavit prepared by a police detective made public on Friday.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs personally contacted Gizmodo editor Brian Lam to request the prototype’s return the day the story was published on April 19, but Lam refused to do so, unless the company provided “confirmation that it is real, from Apple, officially,” according to an e-mail message that was also made public.

“Right now, we have nothing to lose,” Lam wrote. “The thing is, Apple PR has been cold to us lately. It affected my ability to do my job right at iPad launch. So we had to go outside and find our stories like this one, very aggressively.” (Gawker Media had offered to pay anyone who gave it or lent it an Apple prototype.)

Brian Hogan, a 21-year-old Redwood City, Calif., resident, found the phone in a bar. But the affidavit prepared by detective Matthew Broad in the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office reveals that an important tip came when Hogan’s roommate, Katherine Martinson, called police on April 21 to let them know that he had examined it.

Hogan told her that Gizmodo had offered him $10,000 for the phone, and showed her a camera box containing $5,000 in $100 bills, according to the affidavit. It says: “Martinson said Hogan also told her that he will receive a cash bonus from Gizmodo.com in July, if and when Apple makes an official product announcement regarding the new iPhone.”

Broad, the San Mateo County detective, began to prepare a request to search the apartment on Farm Hill Blvd. the following day when, he said, he received an urgent phone call just before midnight from Martinson, saying Hogan and their roommate Thomas Warner were removing any evidence about the iPhone from the apartment and leaving in two separate cars. Broad said he tracked Hogan down at his father’s house, also in Redwood City, and learned that Hogan’s computer had been left at a nearby church.

Warner showed up the house at 1 a.m. and was arrested on two outstanding misdemeanor warrants. Warner claimed that a prototype sticker from the iPhone fell out of his wallet at a Chevron station, and later said a 512MB thumb drive and 1GB Lexar compact flash card were under a bush on Harding Avenue, the affidavit says. Police say they recovered all the discarded hardware.

A First Amendment Fight

In a response to a motion from a group of media companies that included CNET, the Associated Press, Bloomberg, the Los Angeles Times, and Wired.com, Judge Clifford Cretan reversed his earlier ruling and ruled on Friday that circumstances had changed, and now secrecy was no longer necessary.

“It appears appropriate to me at this time to unseal the affidavit,” Cretan said. “I can no longer say there is an overriding interest in sealing.”

On Friday, San Mateo County District Attorney Chris Feasel told the judge that there is no precedent that gives “the court the authority to unseal the search warrant at this time.” Feasel had argued that until charges were filed and there was a criminal defendant, news organizations had no right to access the documents.

Cretan ordered that the affidavit to search Gizmodo editor Jason Chen’s home and his April 28 order sealing the affidavit be made available to the public no later than 2 p.m. PDT Friday.

“It’s gratifying that the judge was willing to reconsider his decision and recognize that circumstances have changed,” Roger Myers, the San Francisco attorney who represented the media coalition, said after the ruling was made.

Background

The story began in March, when Gray Powell, a 27-year-old Apple computer engineer, forgot what may be a 4G iPhone phone at a German beer garden in Redwood City, Calif., after a night of drinking.

With the help of friends, Hogan allegedly approached multiple tech news sites before finally selling the handset to Gizmodo for $5,000. (Sage Robert Wallower, a 27-year-old University of California at Berkeley student, was allegedly one of those friends who contacted technology sites.)

Prosecutors in the case say they are conducting a felony theft investigation, but no charges have been filed.

On April 23, just hours after CNET reported that Apple had contacted law enforcement officials about the phone and an investigation was under way, police showed up at Chen’s home in Fremont, Calif., across the bay from San Francisco. After breaking down his door, they confiscated three Apple laptops, a Samsung digital camera, a 32GB Apple iPad, a 16GB iPhone, and other electronic gear, according to documents Gizmodo posted.

Apple ranks among the most security-conscious companies, and it has gone to great lengths to prevent leaks about its products. To secure trade secrets, the company has not shied away from high-profile courtroom fights. It filed a lawsuit against Mac enthusiast Web site Think Secret, for example, to unearth information about a leak. A state appeals court ruled in favor of the Web site.

In that case, Apple argued that information published about unreleased products causes it significant harm. “If these trade secrets are revealed, competitors can anticipate and counter Apple’s business strategy, and Apple loses control over the timing and publicity for its product launches,” Apple wrote in a brief.

Under a California law dating back to 1872, any person who finds lost property and knows who the owner is likely to be–but “appropriates such property to his own use”–is guilty of theft. There are no exceptions for journalists. In addition, a second state law says any person who knowingly receives property that has been obtained illegally can be imprisoned for up to one year.

Knowing that an item probably belonged to someone else has previously led to convictions. “It is not necessary that the defendant be told directly that the property was stolen. Knowledge may be circumstantial and deductive,” a California appeals court has previously ruled.

“Possession of stolen property, accompanied by an unsatisfactory explanation of the possession or by suspicious circumstances, will justify an inference that the property was received with knowledge it had been stolen.” A California law says lost property valued at $100 or more must be turned over to police.

And here’s another tidbit from the affidavit, explaining Steve Jobs’ involvement:

“Apple General Counsel Bruce] Sewell told me that after Gizmodo.com released its story regarding the iPhone prototype on or about 4/19/2010, Steve Jobs (Apple CEO) contacted the editor of Gizmodo.com, Brian Lam. Jobs requested that Lam return the phone to Apple. Lam responded via the e-mail address…that he would return the iPhone on the condition that Apple provided him with a letter stating the iPhone belonged to Apple.”

Facebook has announced a new security feature that aims to keep hackers from tapping into users’ personal information.

The change comes amid rising concerns about privacy and security on the online social network, which has 400 million members worldwide.

The new feature, announced Thursday, makes Facebook a bit more like an online banking site. Users can identify certain “approved” computers and mobile phones that are allowed to access their Facebook accounts. If an unauthorized device tries to log in, the user will be notified of that activity by e-mail or text message, allowing them, in theory, to shut down an attack before any information is stolen.

In order to access a Facebook account from a new computer, or from a friend’s phone, for example, users may have to answer a security question.

Facebook says the feature is unique in the social networking world.

“We’re confident that these new tools and systems will do a lot to prevent unauthorized logins and the nuisance they can cause,” Lev Popov, a Facebook software engineer, writes in a company blog post. “As always, though, the first line of defense is you. We need you to help by practicing safe behavior on Facebook and wherever you go online.”

Facebook users must choose to activate this change. To do so, log in to Facebook and click the “Account” button at the top right of the screen. From that menu, select “Account Settings.” Scroll down to “Account Security” at the bottom of the page and click the link that says “change.”

The site asks: “Would you like to receive notifications for logins from new devices?” If you would like to receive such updates, then click the button by “yes.”

Facebook has come under fire in recent weeks for changes to its privacy policy and its announcement of the “open graph,” which essentially extends Facebook’s social features onto a number of other websites, including CNN.com.

Some users have complained they are uneasy about their personal preferences showing up on sites other than Facebook.com. Recently, an unknown number of people, including some notable tech pundits, have deleted or deactivated their Facebook accounts in response to privacy concerns.

Last month, a group of U.S. senators sent a letter to Facebook asking the company, which was started in a Harvard dorm room and is now valued at billions of dollars, to give users more control of their private information.

The new security features do not address the issues most users have been complaining about, such as whether Facebook will keep their information private. Instead, the latest feature aims to protect Facebook users from external hackers. It does not change company policy.

The online media this week jumped on news, confirmed by CNN content partner CNET, that Facebook called an “all-hands” meeting in response to the swell of concern over privacy issues. Facebook makes no mention of this meeting in its blog post, and it remains unclear whether Thursday’s changes were a result of that meeting.

Thursday’s changes are drawing some skepticism online.

Dan Nosowitz, a blogger at Fast Company, questioned whether Facebook should have made its new privacy setting active by default.

“Oddly, this system is ‘opt-in,’ meaning by default it’s not enabled. You have to dig through Facebook’s labyrinthine privacy settings to turn it on,” he writes. “This might be a mistake, given how complex and intimidating Facebook’s privacy settings already are.”

On PC World’s website, JR Raphael writes that the changes may not do much to ameliorate the concerns of angry Facebook users: “Facebook has just unveiled a new set of user controls, but it isn’t likely to do much in the way of calming anger about the social network’s privacy policies.”

Let us know what you think of the changes in the comments below. What do you think of Facebook’s efforts to integrate into other websites? Do you feel secure when using the site

It’s hard to believe it’s been more than a year since I stood before the audience at one of my favorite forums, TED. But a year later, our vision for an oil-free world where electric cars are more convenient and affordable than gasoline-powered cars remains the same.

It’s been a turbulent year for the global economy and the events of recent weeks only underscore the urgency of our situation as a society and as a planet. We see firsthand the severe damage oil can inflict, not only on our global economy but also on our environment.

Just look at the tragedy unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico. We will soon see the damage of this horrific event in very human terms, as the damage to the industry, the environment and the livelihood of those in the Gulf grows and all struggle to recover in the coming months and years.

My hope is that we will soon get to a point where we see that the cost of oil in human capital is no longer acceptable and that the increasing complexity of finding and retrieving this diminishing resource no longer makes economic sense. The good news is we are already seeing a shift that will ultimately take us from a transportation system based on a volatile oil ecosystem to one based on a more sustainable model based on electric cars that creates a market for clean energy.

The shift to electrification is inevitable and we’re seeing some of the world’s leading countries make strong commitments to electrification. China, France, Japan and Israel are just a few. Motivations vary from country to country, but the end result will be the same: a stronger economy, healthier automotive sector and increased development of clean energy, leading to a healthier society.

We will see new countries emerge to lead the way, and we will see former powerhouses who fail to act, left behind in this new sustainable global economy. While governments have the ability to accelerate the shift, the question remains how quickly we can get there.

My start-up, Better Place, has made great progress in the past 12 months, and we’re moving forward in all of our committed markets. We began the year by raising $350 million in a financing round led by HSBC, and we continue to drive toward a full system test in Israel later this year, followed by our commercial launches in Israel and Denmark in late 2011.

On April 26th of this year, we launched the first switchable-battery, electric-taxi project in Tokyo. With the support of the Japanese government, we’ve partnered with Nihon Kotsu, Tokyo’s largest taxi operator, to show what’s possible in a rigorous environment with cars that drive almost continuously. Tokyo has much to gain from this: The city’s 60,000 taxis may only represent 2 percent of all cars in the city, but they are responsible for 20 percent of emissions. If the switch works for taxis, imagine how it can work for average drivers.

Just two days before our Tokyo launch, Better Place signed a memorandum of understanding with Chery Automobile Co., China’s largest independent auto producer and exporter. You can’t talk about the future without considering China: They get it, they’ll do it and it’s that simple.

Today only 2 percent of China’s population owns a car, but 80 percent of sales last year came from first-time car buyers, presenting a huge opportunity to get it right. The Chinese recognize EVs as a solution to the problem of the oil monopoly and its associated pollution, as well as an opportunity to leapfrog internal-combustion-engine technology and the rest of the auto industry. In fact, recent research from HSBC predicts that China’s share of the global EV market will grow from 2.7 percent this year to 35 percent by 2020.

In late 2011, we’re planning countrywide rollouts of the Better Place model in Israel and Denmark. With the infrastructure deployment under way, both of these countries will be ready when the first EVs from Renault come to market. We are talking about mass market with these cars — as Better Place and Renault have committed to 100,000 electric cars for Israel and Denmark beginning in 2011. This is just the beginning, and we’re seeing clear direction and new visionaries emerge such as Carlos Ghosn, CEO of Renault Nissan, who sees a future where EVs are mass marketed and make up 10 percent of all car sales by 2020.

Call it a revolution or an evolution, but this shift is happening today. While we still face a number of challenges, over the past 12 months we’ve seen a new willingness from the global auto industry to change. Two years ago, electric cars were considered a niche market by most automakers, but today we see almost every automaker in the world producing electric vehicles.

As the benefits of a more sustainable transportation model are realized, we will very quickly see a dramatic change in the global economy, the health of the car industry and most importantly in the air we breathe. All of this pointing the way to bigger, brighter future. It’s simply up to us to make it happen.

Google’s Android operating system edged out Apple’s iPhone operating system for the No. 2 spot in the U.S. consumer smartphone market in the first quarter, research firm NPD Group reported Monday.

According to NPD, devices running Android accounted for 28 percent of the units sold to U.S. consumers in the first quarter of 2010.

BlackBerry devices made by Research In Motion, which use RIM’s homegrown operating system, took the top spot with 36 percent of the U.S. market. Apple’s iPhone, which had been in the No. 2 spot previously, fell to third place with 21 percent of the market.

NPD’s figures are based on self-reported consumer surveys and they estimate the number of devices sold to consumers. The figures do not include sales of devices to business customers through enterprise contracts.

Android is an operating system that is available on several different models of phones made by different manufacturers, such as Motorola, HTC, and Samsung. Meanwhile, Apple’s operating system is used only on Apple’s own iPhone.

Ross Rubin, an analyst with NPD, attributed the strong growth in Android to the fact that devices using Android software are now available on all major U.S. carrier networks.

Verizon Wireless, in particular, has helped fuel success for the operating system. Verizon launched a major marketing campaign for devices, such as the Motorola Droid, last year. And Verizon, the largest U.S. wireless operator, has also been including Android devices in its buy-one-get-one free smartphone promotion.

T-Mobile USA also features Android phones as its flagship smartphones, and AT&T has begun selling Android phones.

“The wireless carriers in the U.S. are still the king makers in the mobile market,” said Rubin. “Verizon in particular is what is making the Android so successful right now with its promotions and marketing.”

Rubin said that strong sales of the Motorola Droid, HTC Droid Eris, and RIM’s Blackberry Curve via these promotions have helped keep Verizon’s smartphone sales on par with AT&T in the first quarter.

NPD’s data suggests that smartphone sales at AT&T account for nearly a third of the entire smartphone market, about 32 percent. Verizon Wireless accounted for 30 percent of smartphone sales. T-Mobile made up 17 percent of all smartphone sales and Sprint brought in 15 percent of all smartphone sales.

There is no question that Apple’s iPhone is still very popular. Last month, AT&T reported that it had activated about 900,000 iPhones for new customers during the first quarter. It also sold another 1.8 million iPhones to people who were already AT&T customers. Without the iPhone, AT&T’s subscriber growth for contract customers would have been negative.

But the NPD findings suggest that sales of the phone could be even higher in the U.S. if the device was available on other carrier networks, such as Verizon Wireless. Reports surfaced in March that the iPhone could be coming to Verizon soon. But definite plans for a Verizon iPhone have still not been announced.

“If the iPhone was available today on Verizon, Apple would certainly grow market share,” Rubin said. “But it’s harder to say what will happen in the long term. It’s difficult to know what the feature-set will look like on phones in a year. But it’s clear the iPhone still has enough cachet today to pick up market share.”

Nokia is suing Apple over what it claims are infringing patents in the iPad and iPad 3G.

This is just the latest in a series of escalating lawsuits between the two companies regarding their respective mobile and consumer electronic devices.

This lawsuit — which unlike the others was filed in the Federal District Court in the Western District of Wisconsin — is about technologies related to enhanced speech and data transmission.

In a statement, Nokia described this technology as “positioning data in applications and innovations in antenna configurations that improve performance and save space, allowing smaller and more compact devices.”

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment on this story.

Nokia and Apple have been engaged in what we like to call “Patent Lawsuit Theater.” If you haven’t been keeping up with the saga, which began in October, here’s a primer:

* Nokia filed a lawsuit against Apple in Delaware District Court, claiming that the iPhone infringed on many of its patents.

* Apple filed a countersuit against Nokia in December, claiming Nokia is trying to take advantage of Apple by making unwarranted claims in order to try to access Apple’s intellectual property.

* Nokia then filed its motion with the International Trade Commission (ITC), claiming all of Apple’s products violate its patents. This is what the ITC is currently investigating.

* Nokia then filed a second complaint in federal court, this time asking the court and the ITC to ban imports of iPhones, MacBooks and iPods.

* Apple decided it could play the “banninator” card too and filed its complaint with the ITC.

* The ITC started an investigation into Apple’s alleged infringement at Nokia’s request.

Keep in mind, that’s just the Nokia-Apple dispute. That doesn’t even address Kodak’s lawsuit against Apple, Apple’s countersuit against Kodak, or Apple’s lawsuit against HTC.

Mashable anticipate that the next steps will go something like this:

* Apple will countersue Nokia in Wisconsin.

* Nokia will either amend its previous ITC filing or file a new claim requesting bans on U.S. imports of Apple iPad and iPad 3G units.

* Apple will respond with its own ITC filing or amend its previous complaint.

* A new product will get released or a new patent claim will be found and the entire process will start all over again.

What do you think of the latest act in this protracted melodrama between multibillion dollar companies?